Commentary

The Washington Post published an opinion piece yesterday offering a cautionary historical perspective on how anti-pornography crusades like the current War on Porn end up harming marginalized groups like sex workers and the LGBTQ+ community.

Experts say Mike Lee’s new bill suffers from the same constitutional deficiencies that have plagued past attempts at internet regulation.

The California legislature’s latest idea for protecting children online is an unworkable mess - and very likely unconstitutional, as well.

In the post-Roe v. Wade environment, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is more important than ever. The benchmark law is vital in protecting freedom of speech and expression on the internet and it protects all types of online platforms, including adult entertainment websites…

No matter how you feel about abortion, the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturning Roe v. Wade is a threat to our industry’s continued existence. The right to sexual privacy and bodily autonomy rests on the very same foundations as the right to te

The Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, using reasoning that threatens a lot of other “settled law.” Could Section 230 be next to go?

A federal court recently dismissed the Woodhull Foundation’s lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of FOSTA - but the news isn’t all bad.

In a dispatch from deepest Shadowbanistan, Ben Suroeste says while getting deplatformed sucks, it’s not a violation of the First Amendment.

With the overturning of Roe v. Wade, porn’s women are now refusing to participate in “creampie” scenes, and many are doing girl/girl scenes only to reduce the risk of pregnancy.

“If you want better men by any standard, there is every reason to regard ubiquitous pornography as an obstacle,” declared New...