Legal Attacks

He’s been showing fans his ‘body of evidence’ for years on OnlyFans.

The trade association says the overbroad and vague Assembly Bill 2273 places unconstitutional burdens on speech.

A former actress and her husband are among a group of 16 suspects indicted by public prosecutors for allegedly operating online gambling and pornographic websites and money laundering.

The parties in Gonzalez v. Google, a Supreme Court case, made their oral arguments on Feb. 21. At question is the safe-harbor liability immunization web

In ‘Gonzalez v. Google’ and ‘Twitter v. Taamneh,’ the Supreme Court is considering questions that could break the internet as we know it.

Oral arguments in Gonzalez v. Google were heard before the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 21 in a bid to decide whether the safe harbor provisions of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 would either be retained as is or entirely reinterpreted. Section 230, often referred t…

The D.C. judges expressed skepticism about the constitutionality of language in a law that makes it a crime to operate a computer service with the intent to promote prostitution.

Mike Lee has introduced a bill which would rework the definition of “obscenity”. Given the chance, would the Supreme Court do the same?

ESPLERP is calling for supporters to join them in marking International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers, December 17.

The U.S. DOJ weighs in on a major Section 230 case, urging the Supreme Court to rethink the scope of the statute’s safe harbor provisions.