Legal Attacks

The parties in Gonzalez v. Google, a Supreme Court case, made their oral arguments on Feb. 21. At question is the safe-harbor liability immunization web

In ‘Gonzalez v. Google’ and ‘Twitter v. Taamneh,’ the Supreme Court is considering questions that could break the internet as we know it.

Oral arguments in Gonzalez v. Google were heard before the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 21 in a bid to decide whether the safe harbor provisions of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 would either be retained as is or entirely reinterpreted. Section 230, often referred t…

The D.C. judges expressed skepticism about the constitutionality of language in a law that makes it a crime to operate a computer service with the intent to promote prostitution.

Mike Lee has introduced a bill which would rework the definition of “obscenity”. Given the chance, would the Supreme Court do the same?

ESPLERP is calling for supporters to join them in marking International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers, December 17.

The U.S. DOJ weighs in on a major Section 230 case, urging the Supreme Court to rethink the scope of the statute’s safe harbor provisions.

Why are people calling for Section 230 to be repealed? Former president Donald Trump was an outspoke critic of Section 230. President Biden is also a

Yesterday we wrote about how all of the terrible anti-internet bills we were worried about being slipped into the “must pass” National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) bill were, thankf…

If the Supreme Court decides to strike down Section 230, it’s going to become considerably more difficult for centralized social media companies to operate.