The War on Porn Regular Updates about the Assault on The Adult Industry

The United Kingdom could soon see every adult required to carry a digital ID to work legally in the country. Prime Minister Keir Starmer proposed a plan last week that would make digital identification mandatory by 2029.

Employers would be required to check new hires against an app-based system containing personal information such as a person’s name, photo, date of birth, nationality, and residency status. This system would replace the current process of reviewing physical IDs or National Insurance numbers, the U.K.’s equivalent of a Social Security number.

“The proposals are the government’s latest bid to tackle illegal immigration, with the new ID being a form of proof of a citizen’s right to live and work in the UK,” reports Sky News. “The so-called ‘Brit card’ will be subject to a consultation and would require legislation to be passed, before being rolled out.”

Civil libertarians and privacy experts warn that such a scheme could function as a national tracking system. “Currently, when somebody presents a plastic driver’s license, that interaction is between the two parties, and the government is none the wiser,” the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) noted in June. “But digital driver licenses—and other sorts of digital IDs—are being built so that the system notifies the government every time an identity card is used, giving it a bird’s-eye view of where, when, and to whom people are showing their identity. That ‘phone home’ functionality becomes especially intrusive as people start having to use digital ID online, giving the government the ability to track your browsing history.”

Starmer’s proposal stops short of requiring digital IDs for all online activities. “Under the proposals, anybody starting a new job would be required to hold the digital ID, which could then be checked against a central database of those with the right to work in the UK,” Sky News reports.

Still, earlier this year, “Downing Street was exploring proposals for a digital ID card to crack down on illegal migration, rogue landlords and exploitative work,” The Guardian reported. Critics note that such a system could easily be expanded beyond employment verification.

Once in place, politicians could be tempted to use digital IDs for taxes, health records, benefits, or even access to social media and adult websites. Guardian columnist Gabby Hinsliff warned of darker possibilities:

Though Britons wouldn’t have to produce their IDs when stopped on the street under Starmer’s plan, “a future administration could easily change that. Just imagine how useful ID cards would be in rounding people up for Trump-style mass deportations—especially if that effort was linked to facial recognition technology already in use by the British police, creating a system capable of automatically scanning crowds anywhere from a rush-hour Tube station to a football match and matching faces against an immigration database.”

Hinsliff said she was horrified by such a prospect. But, she noted, “many will not be—especially if it’s sold as a tool to stop some group they do not like.”

Civil liberties advocates warn the risks are not just political but also technological. “A centralised digital ID scheme would also be a honeypot for hackers and foreign adversaries, creating huge digital security risks for our data,” said the group Big Brother Watch.

Digital ID Trends in the U.S.

While Britons debate the proposal, the U.S. has already taken steps toward its own form of digital identification. The Real ID Act is one step in this direction, and as of June, 13 states had launched digital driver’s license systems, while another 21 had passed legislation to implement or study them, according to the ACLU. New Jersey passed such a measure in August.

The ACLU has issued recommendations for building digital ID systems that protect privacy. More than 80 individuals and organizations have also signed a letter urging that digital IDs be built without “phone home” capabilities.

“We call on authorities everywhere to favor identity solutions that have no phone home capability whatsoever, and to prioritize privacy and security over interoperability and ease of implementation,” the letter states.

Whether in the U.K. or the U.S., experts warn that political climates marked by suspicion of immigrants, restrictions on speech, and expanded surveillance powers make it less likely governments will adopt the most privacy-protective versions of digital ID systems.

Pornhub’s parent company Aylo confirmed it will not restrict access to its websites in Ohio, despite a new age verification law that took effect on September 30.

Earlier this week, several media outlets incorrectly reported that Aylo planned to block users in the state. The confusion arose after reporters received the same official statement Aylo has used in the past when announcing site restrictions in states with similar legislation.

In its statement, Aylo emphasized that, as a provider of an “interactive computer service” under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, it does not fall under the requirements of Section 1349.10 of the Ohio Revised Code, which mandates age verification for such services.

“We have publicly supported age verification of users for years,” the company said. “However, we believe that any law to this effect must preserve user safety and privacy while effectively protecting children from accessing adult content.”

The company stressed that while it supports efforts to safeguard minors, it will continue to advocate for legislation that balances protection with privacy and security for users.

SHERIDAN, Wyo. — Bad Orange, a creator of sensual audio stories designed for women, announced that its YouTube channel — which had close to 200,000 followers — was recently removed. In addition, the company’s bank account was closed. Bad Orange is pushing back against these moves, calling them both unfair and hypocritical.

“It is confusing, to put it politely, why we are being subjected to these arbitrary standards in this day and age,” said Larry, a classically trained actor who performs under the pseudonym Daddy Sounds.

He pointed to the broader media landscape to highlight what he views as inconsistent standards. “At a moment when the average issue of Slate contains advice letters about extreme kink and The Daily Beast runs ads for Lovehoney’s Advent calendars, which they call ‘an erotic journey of passion, play, and connection,’ complete with sex toys, it’s rather puzzling why our content is viewed as intolerable,” Larry said. “It’s as if they hate women or something.”

Larry compared Bad Orange’s situation to that of the gaming industry, where adult-oriented game creators have seen thousands of accounts shut down by payment processors, devastating their businesses.

“It’s not right. It’s hypocritical, and we’re going to take action,” he added.

Although Bad Orange managed to establish an alternative method for processing payments, the company described the transition as a time-consuming and difficult administrative process.

Sensual audio content has been gaining popularity among women seeking erotic experiences outside the realm of mainstream adult video.

“Voice content is far more intimate and engaging than video,” Larry explained. “Like radio, it stimulates the listener’s imagination and visualization abilities, which is usually vastly more interesting than anything a camera can record.”

For more details, visit the Bad Orange website.

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has dismissed several trafficking-related claims filed against Aylo, the parent company of Pornhub, and credit card processor Visa, according to court orders issued Monday.

The case was brought by Serena Fleites, whose story was highlighted in Nicholas Kristof’s widely discussed New York Times opinion column “The Children of Pornhub.” In the piece, Kristof portrayed Fleites as emblematic of claims that the platform enabled illegal content, including child sexual abuse material. Fleites later disclosed that she had been victimized as a teenager and filed suit against Aylo and Visa.

The lawsuit is being heard by U.S. District Judge Wesley L. Hsu of the Central District of California. Fleites is represented by attorneys Michael Bowe and Lauren Tabaksblat of Brithem LLP, along with David Stein of Olson Sten LLP. Bowe, who previously defended former U.S. President Donald Trump and appeared in Netflix’s Money Shot: The Pornhub Story, co-founded Brithem LLP earlier this year as a boutique firm specializing in what it calls “impact litigation.”

Judge Hsu ruled that many of Fleites’ claims against Visa could not proceed. Her attorneys had sought to hold Visa liable for processing payments connected to Aylo’s platforms, then operating under the name MindGeek. However, Hsu dismissed most of these claims, finding insufficient evidence of active participation in trafficking-related conduct.

“Civil conspiracy with Aylo cannot be triggered solely by knowledge and inertia; it requires affirmative alignment with the venture’s unlawful purpose,” Hsu wrote. He added that there were “no allegations of internal Visa communications, decision-making, or admissions reflecting an understanding of MindGeek’s unlawful objectives,” noting instead that Visa appeared to have simply “continued a pre-existing business relationship in the face of controversy.”

While most claims against Visa were dismissed without prejudice, Hsu allowed parts of Fleites’ case against Aylo to continue. These include allegations tied to the Communications Decency Act and claims related to Aylo’s alleged role in the receipt, distribution, or transportation of exploitative material.

“While the court agrees that plaintiff’s pleadings as to MindGeek’s involvement in the videos as specific to her leave more to be desired,” Hsu wrote, “the court finds that these allegations paired with the general allegations found in the rest of the complaint … are sufficient at this stage of the litigation when all reasonable inferences are drawn in favor of the plaintiff.”

Hsu also dismissed claims that Aylo violated the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA)through direct liability, but he allowed Fleites’ beneficiary liability claim to move forward. That provision of the law allows plaintiffs to pursue damages against entities that knowingly benefited from participation in a trafficking venture.

In addition, Hsu dismissed allegations of conspiracy between Visa and Aylo to violate the TVPRA.

A spokesperson for Aylo declined to comment beyond a short statement: “Out of respect for the integrity of court proceedings, our policy is not to comment on ongoing litigation. We look forward to the facts being fully and fairly aired in that forum.”

COLUMBUS, Ohio — The state of Ohio will begin enforcing age verification regulations for adult entertainment content on September 30. In response, popular content platforms among adult content creators are either implementing age verification or withdrawing entirely from the state’s digital space in an effort to comply with the new law.

The parent company of Pornhub, Aylo, confirmed to The War on Porn that it will expand its geo-blocking protocol to cover Ohio as a protest against the state’s law, specifically targeting adult entertainment content.

A spokesperson for Aylo explained that Ohio is now the latest state with restricted access to its network of platforms, which also includes premium membership websites.

“Any regulations that require hundreds of thousands of adult sites to collect significant amounts of highly sensitive personal information are putting user safety in jeopardy,” the spokesperson said. “Moreover, as experience has demonstrated, unless properly enforced, users will simply access non-compliant sites or find other methods of evading these laws.

“The best solution to make the internet safer, preserve user privacy, and prevent children from accessing adult content is performing age verification at the source: on the device. The technology to accomplish this exists today.”

Meanwhile, Bluesky has begun implementing age verification measures on its platform for all users based in Ohio, according to TechCrunch.

“In Ohio, starting on Monday, 9/29, we’ll be implementing an age assurance solution similar to what we’re doing in South Dakota and Wyoming,” Bluesky posted.

“We recognize that promoting safety for young people is a shared responsibility, and we support the idea of collective action to protect children from online risks,” the company added. “We also recognize that governments may have strong, often conflicting, views on these issues and how to weigh competing priorities.”

The age verification mandate was attached to the appropriations bill, House Bill (HB) 96, signed into law by Gov. Mike DeWine on July 2, 2025.

DeWine stated, “This budget builds upon my commitment to make Ohio the best place for everyone to live their version of the American Dream. … It prioritizes our children, empowers our workforce, and strengthens our communities.”

The War on Porn reported on HB 96 earlier this year, when amendments allowed the addition of a rider bill for age verification.

The bill’s language requires “reasonable age verification methods” that rely on government-issued identification cards, transactional data, and other means.

The provisions were tucked into the 3,156-page omnibus spending bill funding Ohio’s government for fiscal years 2026 and 2027. Companies in the adult entertainment industry, through the vendors they must contract, will be required to verify the same users every two years thereafter.

PARIS — Martin Ajdari, president of French digital regulator Arcom, announced on Thursday that the agency will ramp up enforcement of age verification requirements under France’s SREN law. The remarks were delivered during a public event titled “Minors Online: What Risks, What Protections?”

Addressing regulators, members of Parliament, and industry leaders, Ajdari said Arcom will broaden its focus to include smaller adult platforms, with stricter enforcement measures potentially beginning in the coming months.

He also presented findings from a study commissioned by the regulator to “enable us to refine and strengthen our strategy, in a changing context marked by two events.”

“Between now and the end of 2025, we will be opening a dialogue with these platforms and inviting them to present us with their plans to comply with the measures I have just outlined,” Ajdari explained. He added that in early 2026, Arcom intends to question representatives from “major platforms” and begin “phase II of age verification checks on users of pornographic sites.”

“In this way, we are rolling out a new ambition, both in France and at [the] European level,” he told attendees.

Ajdari stressed that the regulator’s progress to date should motivate further action in cooperation with the French government, Parliament, and the European Commission. “We also need to think about how to adapt our law to technological developments and circumvention strategies,” he said.

By highlighting “circumvention strategies,” Ajdari signaled that Arcom is likely to address flaws in age verification rules, such as how blocks can be easily bypassed through virtual private networks (VPNs) or proxies.

France continues to face disputes with major adult platforms over the scope of the SREN law, particularly regarding enforcement against companies operating outside French borders. One ongoing case involves the parent companies of tube sites XVideos and XNXX, currently before the European Court of Justice. In a recent non-binding opinion, the Advocate General stated that France could apply the SREN law across national borders within the EU, provided the European Commission gives its approval.

ATLANTA — The U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of the city of Chamblee, Georgia, upholding a lower court’s dismissal of a lawsuit brought by the parent company of a now-closed strip club.

Follies, once a prominent club in Chamblee, had challenged local ordinances that prohibited adult entertainment venues from serving alcohol and featuring fully nude dancers. The club’s owners argued that these restrictions violated their First Amendment rights and waged a years-long legal battle against the city.

In 2020, after a federal judge dismissed one of its cases, the club permanently closed. That ruling was later appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, which this week affirmed the lower court’s decision.

“On appeal, Follies argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on its free speech claims,” the appellate ruling stated. The judges noted that the club had urged the courts to apply a strict scrutiny standard to the ordinances, contending they imposed unconstitutional limits on free expression.

The court disagreed, finding that the city had demonstrated “a substantial government interest in decreasing property crime, prostitution, sexual assault, and violence around the adult establishment in its community while still permitting alternative channels of communication, mainly semi-nude erotic dancing.”

By applying a lower level of judicial scrutiny, the panel upheld the ordinances as constitutional.

Follies initially appealed the case in August 2021. At present, there is no indication of any appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Rep. Josh Schriver introduced House Bill (HB) 4938, titled the “Anticorruption of Public Morals Act,” earlier this month. He promoted the measure as a “public decency and public safety solution” aimed at restricting what he described as harmful online speech.

Following widespread pushback and viral attention, Schriver announced on Sept. 24 via the social platform X that he would amend the bill to remove provisions targeting virtual private networks (VPNs) and other “circumvention tools” included in the original draft.

“I will not be advancing … [the act] … as is,” Schriver posted. “I am drafting a new version that removes all language regarding VPNs and non-pornographic imagery to ensure this policy only addresses pornography.”

The initial version of HB 4938 explicitly banned the use of circumvention methods such as VPNs and encryption tunneling, effectively criminalizing common privacy and security tools.

Schriver also signaled plans to revise the bill’s definition of “prohibited materials.” The original text broadly applied to any media with sexual themes, even if not pornographic. His proposed changes would narrow that definition, though the final scope remains unclear.

Another unresolved question is whether Schriver will alter language critics have described as discriminatory. The original draft defined prohibited material to include content depicting “a disconnection between biology and gender by an individual of one biological sex imitating, depicting, or representing himself or herself to be of the other biological sex.”

Corey Silverstein, a Michigan-based attorney who specializes in First Amendment cases involving the adult industry, criticized the measure, calling it “outrageous” and arguing that it “has essentially no chance of survival” in the state legislature.

PARIS — The president of French media regulator Arcom announced on Thursday that the agency will expand its enforcement of age verification rules to cover smaller adult sites, beginning in late 2025 or early 2026.

Since launching enforcement under France’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, Arcom has focused on major high-traffic platforms such as Pornhub, YouPorn, xHamster, XVideos, XNXX, xHamsterLive and TNAFlix.

Between the end of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, however, the regulator will initiate the next stage of its efforts, targeting sites “a little less frequented” than its initial list, Arcom President Martin Ajdari revealed during a public event titled “Minors Online: What Risks, What Protections?”

Arcom will “methodically apply the same procedure” to these smaller sites, Ajdari explained, investigating compliance with age verification rules, issuing formal notices, and ultimately blocking or delisting noncompliant platforms if needed.

“Arcom’s mission is not to intervene on the content itself but to ensure that platforms established in France respect their obligations,” he said. “Today, all the targeted sites have either been blocked (one of them), or have decided to shut down their service in France (this is the case for Pornhub and YouPorn), or have complied.

“In just a few months, we have changed the situation, without of course claiming to have solved everything,” he added.

Ajdari also emphasized that the regulator has continued its work despite “numerous legal proceedings.”

Earlier this year, Cyprus-based Hammy Media, operator of xHamster, challenged the application of France’s age verification rules to companies based elsewhere in the EU. The Paris Administrative Court temporarily suspended enforcement, but the French government appealed to the Council of State, which rejected the company’s arguments.

On Sept. 18, in a separate case involving WebGroup Czech Republic, operator of XVideos.com, and NKL Associates, operator of XNXX.com, an advocate general of the European Union’s Court of Justice advised France’s top administrative court that the country may require pornographic websites headquartered in other EU states to comply with its age verification laws.